quartz reported how "donald dumb changed political journalism" or was it vice versa i cant remember. but either the phrasing, that was my exact sentiment at 3:30pm on Nov 8 GMT+8. I was sitting in clb next to my sleeping friend who previously mentioned is very self-centred (not a bad thing) and when hilarious still needed 52 more god knows what thing (found out last night that their democracy is also very 2.0) i was still so hopeful that dumb wouldnt get it.
why?
because of the media! wth was the media doing? in 50 years time when our children study how dumb won, they will unanimously say "the biased one sided media stoked fears that hilarious will win"
also,
the problem with hilarious not winning , i have to add this bc it is not a fact, IN MY humble OPINION,
is not because she is female
but because the clinton administration has been tried and tested and it didnt deliver!
so as usual
the media will fan rage and confusion by calling it "the highest glass ceiling" walao eh, the media is really irritating!!!!
also, on us's democracy 2.0 which i found out ystd, and was quite surprised because
they always seemed to be champions of the voices of every man on the street.
btw some people actually get offended when people type things like "average man on the street" take a chill pill la, sister and brother. man as in HOMOSAPIENS ok...
very done with the world and their sensitivity and the media fanning the flames.
i dont even want to talk about za tong bao. za tong bao ah, shake head ah shake head.
No comments:
Post a Comment